|
Ever since zoologist Dr. David Fleay made his famous black and white
film
of the last known captive thylacine at the Hobart Zoo in 1933,
Thylacinus
cynocephalus has been an animal which has captured the attention of
Australians and many others throughout the world. By comparison,
most of the other 15 or so Australian marsupials that have become extremely
rare or extinct due to man's ignorance, malice or apathy over the past
200 years have slipped anonymously and uneventfully into the past, only
to be remembered by very few today.
The thylacine however,
is a very different story indeed. A motion picture camera was actually
on location to document the pitiful loneliness of the last
captive individual's remaining years of life, and thus imprint
this sad image into the conscience of an entire planet.
At the turn of the 21st
century however, Professor Michael Archer (then Director of the Australian
Museum in Sydney) instigated a bold and ambitious plan to clone the thylacine.
| Currently
the Dean of Science at the University of New South Wales, he is also a
professor of palaeontology. Archer proposes that it might be entirely
possible for a living thylacine to be cloned from an infant female preserved
in alcohol which has been under the care of the Australian Museum since
1866.
At present, Archer's
plan still occupies an area somewhere between the solid reality of Scottish
researcher Professor Ian Wilmut's successful cloning of a large mammal
- Dolly the sheep - and the science fiction realm of writer Michael Crichton's
Jurassic
Park dinosaurs, resurrected from fragmented strands of DNA preserved
in the blood of fossil mosquitoes sealed in Mesozoic amber.
However, there remains
an immense technological void between cloning a common and readily available
species such as a sheep or cow, and the cloning of a unique marsupial using
only degraded DNA that has been immersed in liquid preservative for about
140 years. Apart from the difficulties of resequencing the thylacine's
complete genome using what genetic material can be obtained from preserved
cells, another major obstacle is that there are no truly close relatives
in the modern Australian fauna that may possibly offer a surrogate womb
for an artificially produced thylacine embryo, or a pouch for any resultant
young. |
.
|
The Australian Museum's
infant female thylacine which has been preserved in alcohol since 1866.
|
|
The thylacine's closest
relatives have been extinct for millions of years. The fossil remains
of many of these earlier thylacinids have been found along with a multitude
of other extinct marsupials in the extraordinary limestone formation that
Archer and his colleagues discovered in the early 1980s at Riversleigh
Station, in northwest Queensland.
Riversleigh
provides a rare view of what animals existed in Australian rainforests
between about 12 million and 25 million years ago, when the predecessors
of the modern-day fauna, along with some now lost marsupial groups which
left no descendants, resided in a much warmer and wetter Australia.
The teeming life of
Riversleigh's rainforests provided abundant prey for meat eaters, which
included a number of thylacine species as well as early dasyurids.
The Dasyuridae are a
diverse group which includes specialized carnivores such as the Tasmanian
devil (Sarcophilus harrisii), and the quolls (Dasyurus sp.),
as well as smaller predators and insectivores such as the Brush-tailed
Phascogale (Phascogale
tapoatafa), dunnarts (Sminthopsis sp.) and tiny Planigale
species which weigh less than 10 grams.
.
|
A life reconstruction
of the prothylacynine borhyaenid marsupial
Prothylacynus patigonicus
from the Early Miocene of South America (based upon a drawing by M. R.
Long). It was somewhat similar to the thylacine in form, but not
ancestral to it.
|
|
It wasn't
until the early 1980s that the thylacine's position within Australian marsupial
taxonomy became truly clear. Morphologically, the thylacine bears
a striking resemblance to the borhyaenids, an extinct family of large wolf-like
marsupial predators from South America. However, in 1982, a comparative
study of blood proteins called albumins indicated that the thylacine is
in fact a close relative of the dasyurids, and suggested that it had branched
off from the main dasyurid line of evolution approximately 12 million years
ago. |
A
decade later, analysis of DNA recovered from a preserved thylacine pelt
provided an even stronger confirmation of this evolutionary affinity. The
borhyaenid link was simply another deceptive case of evolutionary convergence:
similar lifestyles create similar physical forms. However, the albumin
study also misled evolutionary biologists by underestimating how long ago
the thylacinids and dasyurids had diverged from an early proto-dasyurid
predecessor. The recent discoveries of a number of fossil thylacinid
species and at least one ancestral dasyurid at Riversleigh
from
approximately 22 million years ago suggest a minimum divergence time of
25 million years, and possibly even as far back as 30 to 40 million years
ago. |