What is known of the thylacine's behaviour comes largely from the anecdotes
of bushmen, as well as observations of animals that were held in captivity.
Ronald Gunn (1863) shipped a female with three pouch young to the London
Zoo in January 1863, and took notes on her behaviour. A Mr. Crowther
of Launceston captured an adult pair twenty years later, which reached
in London on 14 November 1884 (Renshaw 1938). The male, which died
on 5 February 1891, was quickly dissected by Beddard (1891). The
female lived on until 2 April 1893, at which point she was at least 8½
years of age (Flower 1931).
|
So far as is known, this appears to be the record for thylacine longevity
in a zoo outside of Australia. The typical life span in the wild
is unknown, although based upon records of captive individuals, it is estimated
to be about 8-10 years. Examples of some other large marsupials,
such as the Red kangaroo (Macropus
rufus), have survived for nearly 20 years under captive conditions,
but in the wild have a life expectancy of 8-12 years. |
.
| One
of the thylacines that was exhibited at New York's Bronx Zoo. A male,
this individual was the first thylacine at the zoo. He lived there
from 1902-1908. |
|
Several thylacines were exhibited in European zoos, but only Renshaw (1938)
appears to have made any observations. However, Moeller (1968) was
able to make comment on certain rudimentary aspects of the species' behaviour
through detailed observation of the short film sequences that were taken
of the last thylacine kept in captivity (Hobart Zoo).
Gould (1863) mentioned that the species was quite shy in captivity, and
when disturbed would dash about uttering "a short guttural cry resembling
a bark". It was stated by Le Souef and Burrell (1926) that:
"When excited it makes a series of husky, coughing barks, the breath being
indrawn with a wheeze". Apart from that, they seem to have been rather
silent. The one observed by Renshaw "was active during the early
part of the day, running to and fro in its exercise yard, the head held
low like a hound's on scent. The beast often paused abruptly, as
if to reconnoitre, standing motionless with head raised; it took little
notice of the attendant entering the yard, as if half-blinded by the sun.
When the light became powerful it often retreated to the inner den, where
it curled itself up like a dog; but it would also recline to bask in the
sun, a strange habit for a semi-nocturnal animal. In sleep it lay
on one side fully extended; the upper-most ear remaining erect".
.
| Some
examples of a thylacine exhibiting bipedal standing. In this stance,
it is much reminiscent of a kangaroo. Both of these images are from
a film
taken in 1928 at the Hobart Zoo (Domain site). |
|
Gunn (1863) once observed a female jump 6-8 feet (1.8 - 2.4 m) from the
base of its cage to the top of the wall and from cross-beam to cross-beam
with great ease. However, the most extraordinary detail of behavior
was depicted on the aforementioned film
examined by Moeller, who noted two distinct methods of locomotion.
One is the plantar walk which is common to most mammals, that is, with
diagonally opposite limbs moving alternately, but with the entire pes,
including the long heel, in contact with the ground. (Of course,
this stance is not suitable for running.)
The other method was a bipedal hop. As can be seen in the film, the
animal can stand upright with its front limbs in the air, resting on its
elongated back feet, and using the end of its tail as an additional support.
In this posture, it takes on a very kangaroo-like appearance, and sometimes
hops a short distance.
Anecdotally, it was claimed that the thylacine possesses considerable strength,
and is quite capable of defending itself effectively when threatened by
attacking dogs. A statement by Hugh Mackay (quoted by Le Souef and
Burrell 1926) reads: |
"A bull-terrier was once set upon a wolf (thylacine) and bailed it up in
a niche in some rocks. There the wolf stood, with its back to the
wall, turning its head from side to side, checking the terrier as it tried
to butt in from alternate and opposite directions. Finally, the dog
came in close, and the wolf gave one sharp, fox-like bite, tearing a piece
of the dog's skull clean off, and it fell with the brain protruding, dead."
Being normally quite shy and non-aggressive toward people, attacks on humans
by thylacines in the wild are virtually unheard of. Most of what
very few thylacine-induced injuries are known occurred in zoos when dealing
with nervous or aggravated individuals - in one instance, during a photography
session. Early in 1900, the Scottsdale North-Eastern Advertiser
made mention of a Ms. Priscilla Murray of South Springfield, near Mt. Scott,
who was bitten by a thylacine. She was washing laundry at an outdoor
bench when the thylacine grasped her right arm in its mouth. Of note
is the fact that Ms. Murray mentioned that the animal was missing an eye.
Due to this visual impairment, the thylacine may have possibly mistaken
her moving arm for a prey animal. As she tried to push the thylacine
away, her left hand also sustained bites, but when she inadvertently stepped
on its tail, the animal let go. The scars left by several of the
teeth-marks were still visible many years later (Troughton 1967). |