Wells, Horton and Rodgers, (1982) have conducted studies of the morphology
and development of wear patterns on the teeth of the species Thylacoleo
carnifex. They examined the striations produced by the grinding
of food against the tooth enamel of known carnivores and herbivores and
compared their findings with similar marks on the fossil teeth of Thylacoleo.
The wear patterns created by food passing down the enamel surface of the
Thylacoleo
teeth were similar to those present on the teeth of known carnivores but
were not like those seen on herbivore teeth. They resolved that the
mandibular (lower) teeth retained a stabbing or piercing action, while
the maxillary (upper) teeth functioned as both an anvil against which food
is held and a 'stone' against which the lowers are sharpened. Thylacoleo's
large premolars have a crescent-shaped slicing edge. As these edges
pass each other during a bit, all the shearing forces are directed upon
two converging points.This action is further emphasized by the fine serrated
enamel margins of the teeth, which generate an effect similar to the cutting
edge of a steak knife.
| The
enormous upper incisor teeth are well preserved and plainly visible in
this specimen of a Thylacoleo skull. The reddish ochre colouration
of this fossil is caused by a thin coating of silt particles rich in iron
oxide. Most of the cave fossils found in South Australia exhibit
this feature. If the encrustation is completely removed, the fossil
bone is often surprisingly white, looking not at all that different from
recent bone. |
|
Also, wear
on the maxillary incisors created a blunted, semi-circular wear surface;
in contrast, wear on the mandibular incisors held a sharp triangular outline
from which fine, serrated ridges descended. Examination of the jaw
mechanics of the complete Thylacoleo material indicates a possum-like
jaw musculature designed for stabbing with the mandibular incisors and
slicing with the enormous premolars. All evidence suggests a carnivorous
marsupial of diprotodontid ancestry, not a plant-eater.
The adaptations of Thylacoleo's
limb were for climbing and gripping rather than running and walking, while
the absence of interlocking canines as a method of holding prey was compensated
for by the large, hooded claw of the thumb. Thylacoleo may well
have seized prey by grasping it with its powerful hands, then killed it
by strangulation or suffocation in a similar manner as do lions and cheetahs
(Schaller, 1972); combined use of incisors and premolars would quickly
strip the prey's skeleton of hide and flesh. |
Solid evidence of thylacoleonid
predation has come from examinations of incised bones initially reported
from Queensland (De Vis 1883) and Victoria (Spencer and Walcott, 1912)
and more recently from Lancefield in Victoria (Horton et al., 1979;
Horton and Wright, 1981). Horton and Wright (1981) studied deep v-shaped
incisions on ribs and limb bones of kangaroos and made note that 'The Lancefield
bones suggest that the species (Thylacoleo) was a meat-eater and
give no indication that it was a bone-crusher'. Their proposition
gains support from the absence of completely severed bones in coproloites
(scats), characteristic of the bone-eating and crushing Tasmanian devil
(Sarcophilus harissi).
What animals were preyed upon by Thylacoleo?
Wells, Horton and Rodgers (1982) note that the animal's size itself makes
it an unlikely predator of arboreal species, which are capable of moving
through the highest branches with ease.
| The remains
of Thylacoleo are often found in association with those of the extinct
leaf-eating kangaroos of the genus Sthenurus. Possibly, Thylacoleo
preyed upon these and other kangaroo species and dragged its prey into
trees, as does the leopard, removing it from the reach of scavenging animals
such as the Tasmanian devil. This view harmonizes well with all of
the available evidence and provides a niche for a carnivore, which avoids
competition with the thylacine (Thylacinus) the only other large
predatory Australian marsupial known to have existed. |
Mandible
section of Sthenurus, a large species of extinct
kangaroo from the Pleistocene
epoch. Could this and
other macropods have been
the main prey of Thylacoleo?
This specimen comes from
the Wellington Caves of New
South Wales. Actual
length - 125 mm |
|
Recent findings of fossil
material have extended the geographic distribution of Thylacoleo
to the Pleistocene deposits of the Lake Eyre Basin; indeed it is present
in most Late Pleistocene faunas throughout the whole of the Australian
continent. With the exception of the Victoria Cave Deposit at Naracoorte
(Wells, et al., 1984), its numbers are usually low, which is in
agreement with an animal filling the niche of top carnivore. Thylacoleo
appears to have vanished along with many of the large marsupial herbivores
during a time of great aridity which occurred about 18,000 years ago.
It was a period when the great ice sheets of the northern hemisphere reached
their maximum.
Until quite recently,
Thylacoleo
carnifex was the only representative of the family Thylacoleonidae,
but discoveries in mid-Tertiary sediments of Queensland, the Northern Territory
and South Australia (Archer and Wade, 1976; Archer and Rich, 1982;
Clemens and Plane, 1974; Pledge, 1977) indicate an older diversification
of these fascinating marsupial carnivores (Archer and Dawson, 1982).
Presently, only teeth, skull and jaw fragments are known. While much
smaller in dimension than T. carnifex, species of the Tertiary,
such as Wakaleo alcootensis, Wakaleo oldfieldi, Wakaleo
vanderleuri (mid-Miocene) and T. hill (? Pliocene), all exhibit
the same characteristic slicing premolars featured in their much larger
Pleistocene relative. |