| Nature
of the fossil vertebrate deposits in Victoria Fossil Cave:
The Fossil Bed and Ossuaries
of Victoria Fossil Cave contain the remains of tens of thousands of vertebrate
animals making it one of the richest deposits of Pleistocene vertebrate
fossils in the world (Wells 1975). Represented are over 93 species of frogs,
turtles, snakes, lizards, birds, monotremes, marsupials and placental mammals.
The remains include skulls, jaws and complete skeletal remains which are
often associated and, in some cases, articulated.
The Fossil Bed is located
in the Fossil Chamber, a cavern some 60 m long and 20 m wide. The Bed covers
an area of more than 70 sq m, is at least 4 m deep and is estimated to
contain more than 5000 tonnes of bone-laden silt. The accessible portion
of the deposit consists of a cone and fan deposit . The fossil-bearing
beds are believed (Wells et al. 1984) to have originated in a series of
depositional stages comprising two events: first, clay soil formation with
bone and rock accumulating with the soil products on the cone; and second,
sandy soil formation with fast sedimentation on the cone and periodic water
flows onto the fan. The lower part of this sequence is exposed in the 3
m deep stratigraphic pit and consists of a sequence of poorly-sorted to
partly-sorted quartz sands containing variable quantities of clay, bone,
charcoal and organic remains . The bone in the deposit is bleached and
mineralised and appears to have been exposed sub-aerially for some time
in a dry environment. Bone orientation studies by Wells et al. (1984) show
a predominent alignment of large, long bones with the long axis of the
Cave, with large end downslope, indicating low energy transport of bone
and sediment. Partially articulated material is found at the distal end
of the fan or against the wall of the Cave. From the Fossil Bed, the remains
of the complete range of animals, from very small to very large, have been
retrieved. The Upper and Lower Ossuaries are located several hundred
metres beyond the Fossil Bed and are connected to each other by a short,
very low crawlway.
| The deposit
here consists of a thin veneer of sediment and bone spread over the cave
floor rather than a deep bed as in the Fossil Chamber. The deposit is also
notable for the apparent absence of small vertebrates suggesting either
that the bone accumulated differently to that in the Fossil Bed or alternatively
that water carried smaller material deeper into the cave leaving behind
only the larger bones (Wells et al. 1984). The Ossuaries deposit appears
to be of approximately the same age as the Fossil Bed. In the Lower Ossuary,
a low roof conceals the lateral extent of the deposit while in the Upper
Ossuary it covers an area of more than 40 sq m. |
| The
bone bed deep inside Victoria Fossil Cave. The sheer amount of fossils
contained within this deposit will provide hundreds of years of excavation
work for palaeontologists. |
|
i) Depositional interpretation:
For reasons outlined
by Wells et al. (1984), a pitfall hypothesis for the accumulation of the
fossils is suggested. Studies of the age-frequency distributions of one
of the commonest animals in the fauna, the Red-necked Wallaby Macropus
rufogriseus, suggest that individuals were trapped at random. The depositional
hypothesis proposed is that: 1, large animals fell into the cave via a
pitfall; 2, skeletons of those that perished on the cone were buried by
incoming sediment, redistributed and disarticulated either by mass movement
or gentle rafting when water washed down the cone, or a combination of
both; 3, skeletons of animals that perished on the distal part of the fan
were subject to even less water movement and hence partial articulation
was maintained; and 4, that in the absence of other evidence the proportion
of particular skeletal elements within a local area of any sedimentary
horizon is correlated with the ease of transport of those elements.
The entrance through
which the animals and sediment entered the Fossil Chamber is now completely
sealed but has been determined (by pneumatic and hand augering) to have
been a section of chamber exposed by partial roof collapse (Wells et al.
1984). This was at the base of a doline some 150 m wide, possibly caused
by erosion of the limestone by water flowing towards the entrance. Laterally,
the entrance was steep to vertical with an average width of 10 m, finishing
in a drop of approximately 11 m to cave floor.
Although this was probably
the mode of accumulation of the larger vertebrates in the deposit, Smith
(1971, 1972) suggests that many of the small animals may have been brought
into the cave by a predator, probably an owl. It has been suggested
that the entrance of the cave was possibly a roost for predatory birds,
though Van Tets (1974) believes that many of the birds represented in the
deposit were washed into the cave. At least some of the animals (for example,
some of the frogs, bats and elapid snakes) probably lived in the Cave,
much as they do today.
ii) Age of the deposits:
The bone-bearing sediments
in Victoria Fossil Cave are estimated to have accumulated between 15,000
and greater than 280,000 years before present (BP). Preliminary racemisation
of bone and uranium series dating of bone from the upper levels of the
Fossil Bed are, for uranium series, 125,000 years BP U/Th and 150,000 years
BP U/Pa (Ayliffe and Veeh 1988, Wells et al. 1984) and, for racemisation,
50,000 years BP and 70,000 years BP (plus or minus 20 %) for the same levels
(J. Bada pers. comm. in Wells et al. 1984). Charcoal associated with fossil
bone from the top 1.5 m of the Fossil Bed (Levels 1-10) has been dated
at between 16,700 years BP for Level 1 and 35,000 for Level 10. For the
Upper Ossuary, carbon dating of bone gave a date of 36,500 years BP, while
racemisation of bone gave a date of 20,000 years BP for the same deposit.
Preliminary dating of apatite and collagen is equivocable and Wells et
al. (1984) suggest that the deposit may be outside the range of this dating
technique. More accurate estimations of the deposits' ages are emerging
from the dating work using a variety of methods. These include uranium
series analyses in collaboration with Linda Ayliffe at the Australian National
University (ANU). TIMS dates on flowstones capping and/or sandwiching bone
bearing sediments are extending the age of these deposits to beyond 280,000
years BP. Based on the dates from speleothems in the caves, it is possible
that some deposits may be found to be in excess of 500,000 years old. Electron
Spin Resonance (ESR) dating on tooth enamel in collaboration with Rainer
Grun of the Quaternary Dating Laboratory has confirmed a Middle Pleistocene
age for the Fossil Bed and Grant Hall. Dates range back to 350,000 years
BP, confirming results from the U-series dating. Optically Stimulated Luminescence
(OSL) dating of the associated quartz in the bone beds by Richard Roberts
of LaTrobe University is at a preliminary stage. His dates are suggesting
some sands entered the caves between 200,000 to 300,000 years BP. |