.
PALAEONTOLOGY:
- PREHISTORIC RANGE OF THE THYLACINE -
(page 1)
.

 
.
    The geographic distribution of the modern thylacine species, Thylacinus cynocephalus, formerly extended throughout much of the Australian mainland and New Guinea.  Only within relatively recent times has the species disappeared from these regions.  Numerous examples of fossil and non-fossil remains of the thylacine (dating from both the Pleistocene and Holocene) have been found on the mainland, and there are many known depictions of the thylacine in ancient Aboriginal rock art.  A few fragments of bone, found in association with a thylacine humerus discovered at Tunnel Creek, Western Australia, have been radiocarbon dated at 0 ± 80 years BP, though this date may not apply to the humerus itself (Archer 1974).  Apart from this discovery, the most recent finds are the 3,000 year old specimens from Padypadiy, Northern Territory (Calaby and White 1967) and Murray Cave, Western Australia (Archer 1974).

Palaeontological evidence:

.
    The classification of fossil thylacine material of Quaternary age has been somewhat complicated because a number of nineteenth century taxonomists failed to recognize the size variations which occur within T. cynocephalus.  For example, when DeVis (1894) received the left side of a skull discovered at Ellagowan, on the Darling Downs, he made a comparison between it and a single skull of the modern species.  Finding the fossilized skull to be somewhat larger, he declared it to be
.
Pleistocene marsupial fossils - Owen (1877)
.
Plate 5 ("Cave Fossils") from Richard Owen's (1877) "Researches on the fossil remains of the extinct mammals of Australia..." which depicts Pleistocene marsupial fossils from the caves of New South Wales.  Included are some illustrations (second row of figures from the bottom) of Thylacinus spelaeus (=cynocephalus).
.
that of a separate species, Thylacinus rostralis.  Similarly, Thylacinus breviceps was assumed by Krefft (1868) to be a small species, but was actually an immature specimen of T. cynocephalus (Moeller 1968).  DeVis (1894) realized that T. major from the Wellington Caves was identical to the widespread "cave tiger", T spelaeus, which Ride (1964) demonstrated to be the same as the modern species.

    Ride (1964) studied both fossil and recent examples of thylacine material from throughout Australia.  By measurement comparison, he was able to demonstrate that T. spelaeus falls within the range of variation of T. cynocephalus.  However, he did not make a conclusive decision on T. rostralis, commenting that the specimens found in the southwestern region of the continent appeared to be smaller than average.  To avoid the complications which can occur when measuring juvenile skulls, Lowry (1972) took measurements of the specimens' teeth, which do not grow continuously throughout life.  The fossils from the southwest were 10% smaller than the average, and those from Eucla 13% smaller, but were still within

the acceptable size range for a single species.  One could speak at length about the studies which have been undertaken to verify the taxonomy of fossil thylacine material of Quaternary age (Pleistocene and Holocene epochs).  Historical interest aside, this is unnecessary at this juncture, as it has been established that all such specimens can be considered to belong to the modern species, T. cynocephalus.
.
Pleistocene-age thylacine skull - Lake Menindee, NSW
.
Lateral and dorsal views of a Pleistocene-age thylacine (T. cynocephalus) skull found by palaeontologist R. A. Stirton at Lake Menindee, NSW, in March 1953.  Specimen UCMP 53038.
Courtesy: Sarah Werning, University of California Museum of Paleontology (Berkeley).
Photos: International Thylacine Specimen Database Sixth Revision (pending).

    Species names as breviceps, major, rostralis and spelaeus were used during the nineteenth century to describe various Quaternary thylacine specimens from a number of different localities.  However, such names are no longer applied, as studies of said remains have been unable to find any morphological distinctions which are significant enough to warrant separate classifications.  Variability in size can be seen among specimens of Pleistocene and Holocene age from various localities, with some being either somewhat larger or smaller than the average modern T. cynocephalus, but these size differences alone are not considered a solid basis for making taxonomic distinctions.  The size variations are, most likely, simply due to factors such as sexual dimorphism, or the particular environmental conditions under which the animals lived.

.
.
Acknowledgement: This subsection of the Thylacine Museum has been referenced (in part) from: SMITH, M., 1982. Review of the Thylacine (Marsupialia, Thylacinidae). In "Carnivorous Marsupials - Vol. 1" (Ed. M. Archer). Roy. Zool. Soc. N.S.W.: Sydney. pp. 237-53.
References
.
back to: Fossil Thylacines (page 5) return to the section's introduction forward to: Prehistoric Range of the Thylacine (page 2)


Search the Thylacine Museum
Site Map
Website copyright © C. Campbell's NATURAL WORLDS.
Photographs and other illustrations (where indicated) are © C. Campbell's NATURAL WORLDS.
Other photos and images are © their respective owners.